NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cahill v Kenna (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 200 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 17 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Costs payable by plaintiffs to defendants to be assessed on the indemnity basis from 1 November 2014. Catchwords: COSTS - indemnity costs - Calderbank letters - whether an offer to walk away amounts to a genuine offer to compromise - whether non-acceptance was unreasonable - relevance of whether evidence had been served - where plaintiffs indicated willingness to agree to offer, then changed their minds - whether court should draw inferences as to why they changed their minds - where, even without the benefit of hindsight, the plaintiffs' case was very weak - whether indemnity costs should run from the date of offer or the date of expiry. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No.2) [2009] NSWCA 12 Cahill v Kenna [2014] NSWSC 1763 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368 Category: Costs Parties: Peter Anthony Cahill (First Plaintiff) Duell Estates Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) Greg Kenna (First Defendant) ACN 102 262 359 Pty Ltd (Formerly Landmark White (NSW) Pty Ltd) Representation: Counsel: MS Henry SC/JAC Potts (Plaintiffs) M T McCulloch SC / MF Newton (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate