NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mooney v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1933 Hearing dates: 28 October 2014 Date of orders: 28 October 2014 Decision date: 28 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Defendant directed to answer interrogatories 2 to 10 and 13 to 21 in accordance with these reasons and the concessions agreed between the parties. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – interlocutory steps – application of Practice Note SC CL 4 – whether interrogatories proposed by plaintiff necessary Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 22.1 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Clout v Jones [2011] NSWSC 1430 Cotter v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 587 Goold v Newcastle Newspapers Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 133 Hansen v Border Morning Mail (1987) 9 NSWLR 44 Howard v Nationwide Publishing Services (Supreme Court (NSW), Hunt J, 26 February 1987, unrep) Kermode v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 646 Lewis v Page (Supreme Court (NSW), Hunt J, 15 December 1989, unrep) Makin v John and Sons Limited (Supreme Court (NSW), Hunt J, 15 June 1990, unrep) Mooney v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 938 Palmer v John Fairfax & Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 727 Yates v Brereton (Supreme Court (NSW), Hunt J, 15 December 1989, unrep) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Darren John Mooney (Plaintiff) Nationwide News Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Richardson (Plaintiff) L Barnett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate