NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 189 Hearing dates: 3-5, 9-10 March 2015 Date of orders: 10 March 2015 Decision date: 10 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The evidence of recorded conversations between the accused and Jodi Biles on 1 September 2011 and 6 September 2011 is excluded. (2) The evidence of the unrecorded statements of the accused at the Bathurst police station on 18 January 2013 is excluded. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – unsolved missing persons investigation – suspected cold case murder – use of listening device – where device deployed in psychiatric hospital – accused recovering from acute psychosis – whether police failed to disclose relevant information in application for surveillance device warrant – discretion to exclude admissions that are unfair – whether witness an agent of the state – whether witness "elicited" admissions – where accused had not previously been interviewed or advised of his right to silence CRIMINAL LAW – admissions – whether admission induced by offer of "off the record" conversation – whether reliability adversely affected – fairness discretion Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Asim v Penrose & anor [2010] NSWCA 366 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 Em v R [2006] NSWCCA 336 Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46; 232 CLR 67 Flanagan v Australian Federal Police [1996] FCA 16; 134 ALR 495 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Neat Holding Pty Ltd v Karajan Holding Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; 67 ALJR 170 Ousley v The Queen [1997] HCA 49; 192 CLR 69 Pallier v Solomons (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1524 Pavitt v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 88; 169 A Crim R 452 R v Chadd [2006] NZCA 449 R v Em [2003] NSWCCA 374 R v Esposito (1998) 105 A Crim R 27 R v Gallagher [2013] NSWSC 1102 R v Horton (1998) 104 A Crim R 306 R v Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29; 53 NSWLR 480 R v Plotzki (1972) QDR 379 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 143 R v Ye Zhang [2000] NSWSC 1099 The Queen v Noakes (1986) 42 SASR 489 Tofilau v The Queen [2007] HCA 39; 231 CLR 396 Walsh v The Queen [1996] TASSC 59 Texts Cited: Odger's Uniform Evidence Law (11th Edition) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown Tony James Simmons (Accused) Kieran Moore (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P Barrett (Crown) P Young SC (Simmons) J Stratton SC (Moore)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate