NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael John Askew v John Paul Askew [2015] NSWSC 192 Hearing dates: 20, 21, 24 November and 11 December 2014 Date of orders: 04 March 2015 Decision date: 04 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: At [119]-[121] and [138] Catchwords: EQUITY - Succession - claim for family provision order under Succession Act s 59 - Where applicant is an adult child of deceased - Where deceased did not make provision for applicant in will - Whether adequate provision made for proper maintenance, education and advancement in life of applicant - Consideration of matters under Succession Act s 60(2) - Disentitling conduct alleged - Value of the estate's property in dispute - Extent of debts in dispute - Issues in respect of the plaintiff's and defendant's circumstances - Question of right to reside or life interest in favour of deceased's brother - Plaintiff's right to costs challenged - Order for cost capping sought by defendant - Application by plaintiff to reopen - Provision as a lump sum or percentage of net real estate proceeds. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Amendment (Fraud, Identity and Forgery Offences) Act 2009 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson Andrew v Andrew [2012] NSWCA 308 Aubrey v Kain [2014] NSWSC Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2006] NSWSC 826 Baychek v Baychek [2010] NSWSC 987 [22] Bouttell v Rapisarda Brown v Grosfeld Burke v Burke [2014] NSWSC 1015 Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Dalton v Paull (No 2) [13] Dinnen v Terrill [2007] NSWSC 1405 Dodds v Dodds [2013] NSWSC 1933 Dolman v Palmer Edgar v Public Trustee for the Northern Territory 2011 NTSC 5 Evans v Levy [2011] NSWCA 125 Feeney v Feeney [2008] NSWSC 890 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Goldberg v Landerer [2010] NSWSC 143 Goodman v Windeyer [1980] HCA 31 In the Estate of the Late Anthony Marras [2014] NSWSC 915 McCosker v McCosker [1957] HCA 82 Michele Firriolo v Bruno Firriolo & Anor [2000] NSWSC 1039 Moore v Moore [2004] NSWSC 587 [43] Nichols v Hall [2007] NSWCA 356 Nudd v Mannix [2009] NSWCA 327 Palmer v Dolman [2005] NSWCA 361 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales Re Keenan (1913) 30 WN (NSW) 214 Sergi (bnf Solowiej) v Sergi [2012] WASC 18 Shakespeare v Flynn [2014] NSWSC 605 Sherbourne Estate (No 2); Vanvalen v Neaves (2005) 65 NSWLR 268 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40; 181 CLR 201 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan [2013] NSWSC 522 Stern v Sekers; Sekers v Sekers [2010] NSWSC 59 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Underwood v Gaudron [2014] NSWSC 1055 Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser Vigolo v Bostin Walker v Walker [1996] NSWSC 188 Wheatly v Wheatly [2006] NSWCA 262 White v Arizon Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1051 Zagame v Zagame Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael John Askew (Plaintiff) John Paul Askew (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Doust (Plaintiff) R Askew (Defendant's wife, with leave to appear)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate