NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 4);; Haddad v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 193 Hearing dates: 10 February 2015 Date of orders: 10 February 2015 Decision date: 10 February 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Decision as to interrogatories Catchwords: DEFAMATION – procedure – objections as to interrogatories – application of Practice Note SC CL 4 – whether proposed interrogatories are necessary for the resolution of the real issues in dispute – whether appropriate to interrogate in order to learn a matter subsequently to be relied upon in aggravation of damages Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 22(b)(i), Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 30 Cases Cited: Clark v Ainsworth [1996] NSWSC 610; 40 NSWLR 463 Clout v Jones [2011] NSWSC 1430 Cotter v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 428 Haertsch v Channel 9 Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 182 Kermode v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 646 Mooney v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1933 Triggell v Pheeney [1951] HCA 23; 82 CLR 497 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Wisam Haddad (First Plaintiff) Steve Dablis (Second Plaintiff) Jamal El-Haouli (Third Plaintiff) Mauhamed Sari (Fourth Plaintiff) Nationwide News Pty Limited (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate