NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Philip Joseph Hodges v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2015] NSWSC 195 Hearing dates: 4 March 2015 Decision date: 04 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Decisions of the proper officer and review panel quashed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Claim for prerogative relief – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) ss 63(1), 63(3) and 63(4) – whether a decision of the proper officer of the Authority to refer to a three member panel was beyond power – HELD – s 63(3) requires and permits only the application referred to in s 63(1) to be referred – the proper officer invalidly referred a clarified dispute rather than the application – this was beyond power and void. Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1991 No 41 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Serria Gergis & Others [2011] NSWSC 1424 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Philip Joseph Hodges - Plaintiff Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance - First Defendant The Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales - Second Defendant David McGrath, Medical Assessor - Third Defendant Josephine Redmond, Proper Officer, Medical Assessment Service - Fourth Defendant The Medical Review Panel comprising Assessor Mark Burns, Assessor Stephen Bukley and Assessor Tai-Tak Wan - Fifth Defendant Representation: Counsel: E. Romaniuk SC with E.G. Grotte - Plaintiff J. Turnbull - First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate