NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dank v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 1938 Hearing dates: 11 December 2014 Date of orders: 11 December 2014 Decision date: 11 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: The pleading as against the fourth defendant is struck out without liberty to re-plead. The claim as against the fourth defendant is dismissed. The plaintiff is to pay the fourth defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – publication – television news item including material previously published by a journalist in a newspaper article – where journalist not employed by the television station – plaintiff attempting to hold the journalist liable as a publisher of the whole of the television news item – principles stated in Webb v Bloch – whether particulars capable of establishing claim on those principles Cases Cited: Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby League Football Club [2014] NSWCA 288 Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby League Football Club (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1850 Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062 Webb v Bloch [1928] HCA 50; 41 CLR 331 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Stephen Dank (Plaintiff) Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Peter Overton (Second Defendant) Sarah Harris (Third Defendant) Phil Rothfield (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Evatt (Plaintiff) T Blackburn (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate