NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coshott v Parker [2015] NSWSC 197 Hearing dates: 5 February 2015 Date of orders: 12 March 2015 Decision date: 12 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 15 October 2014 dismissed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Costs assessment – Scheme for costs assessment in Legal Profession Act 2004 – Determination of cost assessor referred to Review Panel –Certificate of Determination of Costs issued by costs assessor and filed in court – whether filing of Certificate impermissible while review taking place – whether filing of Certificate while review taking place amounted to an illegality or procedural irregularity – whether filing of certificate should be set aside.
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Legal Profession Act 2004 – Effect on Certificate filed under s 368(5) of referral to Review Panel under Subdivision 5 – Relationship between s 377(1) and filing of certificate under s 368(5) – Whether s 377(1) prohibits or qualifies the filing of a certificate under s 368(5).
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Principle in Kable v DPP – whether costs assessment scheme provided for in s 368(5) Legal Profession Act 2004 compromises institutional integrity of Chapter III Courts – whether costs assessment scheme incompatible with exercise by Supreme Court of New South Wales of federal judicial power pursuant to Ch III Constitution – Constitutional validity of s 368(5) Legal Profession Act – whether s 368(5) a valid legislative enactment of New South Wales Parliament. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (NT) v Emmerson (2014) 307 ALR 174 Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ljiljana Coshott (Plaintiff) Michelle Lena Parker (First Defendant) Christina Marie Collins (Second Defendant) Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales (Intervener) Representation: Counsel: O Jones (Plaintiff) M Castle; S J Roulstone (Defendants) S Robertson (Intervener)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate