NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Agripower Barraba Pty Ltd v Blomfield (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 49 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 16 March 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ; Beazley P; Sackville AJA Decision: The Court confirms that:
1 Agripower's motion to adduce further evidence is dismissed. 2 Agripower pay the respondents' costs of Agripower's motion to adduce further evidence. 3 Otherwise there be no order as to the costs of the appeal. Cases Cited: Agripower Barraba Pty Ltd v Blomfield [2015] NSWCA 30 Category: Costs Parties: Agripower Barraba Pty Ltd (Appellant) Dean Blomfield (First Respondent) Penelope Blomfield (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: GK Burton SC / JC Conde (Appellant) TGR Parker SC / M Castle (Respondents)
Solicitors: Neill Scott Lawyers (Appellant) Lyons Barnett Kennedy (Respondents) File Number(s): 2013/342847 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Citation: [2013] NSWSC 1598 Date of Decision: 5 November 2013 Before: Black J File Number(s): 2012/320018
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate