NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Milat, Ivan Robert Marko - Application under Section 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 209 Hearing dates: On written submissions Date of orders: 13 March 2015 Decision date: 13 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: Application under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for inquiry into convictions - Applicant convicted of seven counts of murder and detaining for advantage - appeal dismissed by Court of Criminal Appeal and special leave to appeal refused by High Court of Australia - five unsuccessful applications for inquiry into convictions - matters raised by Applicant previously dealt with on earlier applications - special facts or special circumstances not demonstrated - application refused under s.79(3) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Legislation Cited: Bail Act 1978 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Legislation (Review of Convictions) Amendment Act 1993 Cases Cited: Application by Ivan Robert Marko Milat Pursuant to Section 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2014] NSWSC 434 Application of Milat [2006] NSWSC 1391 Application of Milat [2008] NSWSC 732 Application of Milat [2010] NSWSC 1292 Kirk Group Holdings Pty Limited v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2006] NSWCA 172; 66 NSWLR 151 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 Milat v The Queen [2004] HCA Trans 179 R v Milat (Court of Criminal Appeal, Gleeson CJ, Meagher JA and Newman J, BC9800394) R v Milat [2005] NSWSC 920; 157 A Crim R 565 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383; 85 NSWLR 783 Texts Cited: Criminal Law Review Division, Issues Paper, "Review of Section 475 of the Crimes Act 1900" (November 1992) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ivan Robert Marko Milat (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Ivan Robert Marko Milat (Applicant in person) Ms J Caldwell - Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/326111 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate