NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Henderson v Lees [2014] NSWSC 1948 Hearing dates: Monday 24 November 2014 Date of orders: 24 November 2014 Decision date: 24 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision and maintenance – application by adult son – where will leaves estate to plaintiff son of first marriage and deceased's surviving second partner equally – whether plaintiff left without adequate provision for proper maintenance, education and advancement – where plaintiff does not have present resources for contingencies – where plaintiff received substantial provision during the deceased's lifetime – where surviving partner contributed significantly to deceased's welfare during her lifetime – balancing moral obligation owed to adult child and partner – comparative needs positions of plaintiff and partner – held, equal distribution of estate not inappropriate Legislation Cited: (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006, s 59, s 60(2) Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656 In the Estate of the Late Anthony Marras [2014] NSWSC 915 Re Fulop Deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Stewart v McDougall (New South Wales Supreme Court, 19 November 1987, unreported) Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Russell Stephen Henderson (plaintiff) Lucille Lees (first defendant) Stanley Alfred Monroe (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: R J Brender with G E Babe (plaintiff) R D Wilson SC (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate