NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shoal Bay Developments Pty Limited v Port Stephens Council (No 2) [2015] NSWLEC 36 Hearing dates: 11 March 2015 Decision date: 11 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. The Notice of Motion filed 10 February 2015 is dismissed. 2. Each party to pay its own costs. Catchwords: REVIEW – review of decision of registrar that monitoring reports sought under notices to produce should be produced – notice of motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act s 38 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 49.19 Cases Cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores (1998) 153 ALR 393 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 64; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Golden Max Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council [2015] NSWLEC 16 Groeneveld v Wollongong City Council [2009] NSWLEC 149; (2009) 168 LGERA 260 Melaleuca Estate Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council [2006] NSWCA 31; (2006) 143 LGERA 319 Shoal Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council (Registrar Gray, NSWLEC, 6 February 2015, unreported) Sparnon v Apand Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 684 Tomko v Plasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71 NSWLR 61 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Shoal Bay Developments Pty Limited (Applicant) Port Stephens Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Green with Mr MF Fozzard (Applicant) Mr Connors (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate