NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Citigroup Pty Limited v Middling (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 221 Hearing dates: 2 - 3 March 2015 Decision date: 17 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Judgment for the first cross-defendant on the cross-claim. (2) Unless either party makes an application for a different order for costs, order the cross-claimant to pay the first cross-defendant's costs of the proceedings, other than the costs of the adjournment and amendment ordered on 1 May 2014, which are the subject of a separate application. Catchwords: CONTRACT – agency – no relationship of agency between lender or manager and mortgage originator – originator acting on its own behalf when filling out loan application for borrower and including false statements of borrower's income and employment – borrower authorised lender to pay funds to originator's sole director – lender not liable for alleged misappropriation CONTRACT – Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) – no basis for relief made out in pleading – importance of pleadings and particulars to inform lender of case it has to meet – cross-claim statute-barred in any event – relief under Act intended to be used as a shield not a sword – subs 16(c) of the Contracts Review Act UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT – requirement of moral obloquy not present – lender unaware of dishonest conduct by mortgage originator Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58 Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), ss 4, 7, 9, 16(c) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 34(1), 34(2) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 57(2)(b) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 51AC Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Baltic Shipping Co. v Merchant "Mikhail Lermontov" (1994) 36 NSWLR 361 Citigroup Pty Limited v Middling [2014] NSWSC 474 Davis v Williams [2003] NSWCA 371 Heperu Pty Ltd v Morgan Brooks Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2007] NSWSC 1438 Kirkpatrick v Kotis [2004] NSWSC 1265; 62 NSWLR 567 Landa v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd [2014] NSWCA 393 Lloyd v Grace Smith & Co. [1912] AC 716 Michalopoulos v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited [2010] NSWSC 1450 Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 129 Peddie v Stein (Unreported, Young J, 26 March 1987) Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Schmidt [2010] VSC 67 Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA 36 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Limited v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 Tran v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited [2012] NSWSC 1560 Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard [1939] 2 KB 248 Texts Cited: John R Peden, Harsh and Unconscionable Contracts: Report to the Minister for Consumer Affairs and Co-operative Societies and the Attorney-General for New South Wales, (1976). John R Peden, The Law of Unjust Contracts, (1982, Butterworths). Category: Principal judgment Parties: Citigroup Pty Limited (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Dennis James Middling (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: DW Elliott (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) M Ashhurst SC/P Newton (Second Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate