NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Joukhador v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2015] NSWCATAD 43 Hearing dates: 15 January 2015 Decision date: 17 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R Perrignon, Senior Member Decision: The respondent's decision on 1 August 2014 to assess the subject land to land tax in respect of the 2014 tax year is confirmed. Catchwords: Land tax - exemption for child care facility under section 10(1)(u) - land being developed for use as a child care facility - whether 'used for the provision of an approved education and care service'
Land tax - Chief Commissioner may assess land to land tax - whether obliged to do so - whether assessment unfair, unreasonable or illogical Legislation Cited: Children (Education and Care Services) National Law (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 Land Tax Management Act 1956 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) (2009) 239 CLR 27 Caruana v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 183 Gunasti v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2012) NSWADT 218 Leda Manorstead v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWSC 867 Loomes v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2014) NSWCATAD 133 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Texts Cited: Les & Michael Joukhador (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Les & Michael Joukhador (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Walker (Respondent) Solicitor: L and M Joukhador (Applicants in person) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410452
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate