NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clarke v Croucher [2015] NSWSC 230 Hearing dates: 12 and 13 March 2015 Date of orders: 13 March 2015 Decision date: 13 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [40] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – application by former son-in-law of testator SUCCESSION – family provision – costs – unsuccessful plaintiff – appropriate order EQUITY – constructive trust – need for clear and unequivocal representations – need for detrimental reliance COSTS – costs of unsuccessful plaintiff – appropriate order Cases Cited: Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 702 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 McDougall v Rogers (Estaet of James Rogers); re Bodman [1972] Qd 12 Click here to enter text.Oakes v Oakes [2014] NSWSC 1312 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40; 181 CLR 201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Richard Clarke - plaintiff Michael Croucher – first defendant Cameron Croucher – second defendant Lynda Caroline Clarke – third defendant Representation: Counsel: L Ellison SC – for the plaintiff G P George – for the first, second and third defendants Solicitors: Marsdens Law Group Reimer Winter Williamson – for the first, second and third defendants File Number(s): 2014/019355
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate