NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: James v Royal Bank of Scotland; McKeith v Royal Bank of Scotland [2015] NSWSC 243 Hearing dates: 24 November 2014 to 10 December 2014 Date of orders: 19 March 2015 Decision date: 19 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: James v RBS: judgment to be for plaintiff for $2,932,692.31 plus interest; reserve costs. McKeith v RBS: judgment to be for defendants; reserve costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT - employment - termination - arising from takeover of employer by consortium - where employer's redundancy policy required making of severance payments and of giving good faith consideration to making of bonus payments - whether redundancy policy expressly incorporated into contract of employment - effect of contractual term stating that employee is bound by a policy containing bilateral obligations - whether redundancy policy alternatively incorporated into contract of employment by course of dealing
CONTRACT - deed of release - whether redundancy policy permitted requiring a deed of release as a precondition to making of severance or bonus payments - whether legitimate for deed of release to be unilateral and broad in its terms
CONTRACT - unilateral contracts - whether representations that redundancy policy would remain in place amounted to a contractual offer - where no clear and unequivocal mode of acceptance of such offer - where no evidence of reliance on offer in any event - whether representations that new chief executive officer would be selected through a fair appointment process based on merit amounted to a contractual offer - representations not promissory in nature - where not shown in any event that the appointment process lacked fairness or transparency
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate