NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Evans v Braddock [2015] NSWSC 249 Hearing dates: 9,10,11 and 12 February 2015 Decision date: 19 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen J Decision: Order that the further amended Statement of Claim is dismissed.
Orders that the argument on the issue of costs be stood over to a suitable date unless the parties are able to reach agreement on how the costs of the proceedings are to be borne. Catchwords: EQUITY - Equitable estoppel by encouragement alleged - Family relationship - Assertion that conversation with father, in about 1983, that Plaintiff son would effectively receive, by Will, one third of certain identified real property amounted to an irrevocable promise or assurance - Where that real property held jointly by father and mother - Alleged silence by mother who was present at time of alleged promise or assurance - Whether court satisfied that any promise or assurance to give property to son - Whether promise or assurance given by mother by silence - Whether son or company acted to his or its detriment in reasonable reliance on alleged promise or assurance - Whether detriment proved - Whether father and/or mother knew of alleged reliance by son or company - Whether any unconscionable conduct by father and/or mother - Revocability of alleged promise or assurance - Subsequent conduct of parties - Onus of proof on son to prove reliance - Son's alleged reliance upon promise or assurance by both father and mother inconsistent with his and the company's conduct, years later, and before death of father and mother - Relevance of such conduct - Whether estate of mother bound to give effect to alleged irrevocable promise or assurance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate