NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cihan v Border Hotels No 2; Border Hotels No 2 v Cihan [2015] NSWSC 297 Hearing dates: 18 March 2015 Decision date: 18 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Discharge existing interlocutory injunction, grant interlocutory relief restraining removal of fixtures and fittings. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - interlocutory issues - injunctions - where the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) had made a 'procedural direction' restraining landlord under a retail lease from locking tenant out of premises - where that direction or injunction was conditioned on the tenant paying the landlord a weekly sum - where payments made neither in full nor on time – NCAT proceedings transferred to Supreme Court - application by landlord to set aside the directions of NCAT - whether discrepancies in evidence sufficient to account for shortfall in repayments by tenant - whether retail lease agreement as varied provided any reason to deviate from the directions of NCAT - whether tenant should be allowed equitable relief against the consequences of its own failure to do equity Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mehmet Cihan as Trustee for Cihan Family Trust (Plaintiff/Defendant) Border Hotels No 2 Pty Ltd (Defendant/Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: J Jobson (Plaintiff) A Ahmad (Defendant)
Solicitors: Andresakis & Associates (Plaintiff) Dib Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/29699 and 2015/38019
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate