NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Russo v Desiatnik (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 256 Hearing dates: 7-8 October 2014 Decision date: 19 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The appeal of the plaintiff is dismissed. (2) The cross-appeal of the defendant is allowed. (3) Costs are reserved. (4) The parties have liberty to approach my Associate within two (2) weeks from today to set a date for hearing to determine precise orders to give effect to orders 1 and 2, and to determine the question of costs. Catchwords: APPEAL FROM LOCAL COURT – dispute regarding payment of legal fees – costs agreement between solicitor and barrister – bills of costs – whether Magistrate made an error of law by misinterpreting the requirements of Pt 11 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) – cross-appeal – whether Magistrate made an error of law in refusing to order interest up to commencement of proceedings in favour of the barrister Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39(1) Legal Profession Act 1987, ss 175, 176, 184(1), 184(2), 189, 190(1), 190(2), 190(3) Legal Profession Regulation 2002, regs 45(1)(d)(i), 45(1)(d)(ii), 45(1)(g), 45(2)(b) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 14(1) Cases Cited: Conder v Silkbard [1999] NSWCA 459 Dennis v Cameron [2007] NSWCA 228 Kulevska v Coshott [2006] NSWSC 963 Maloney v Collins [2011] NSWSC 628 The Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; 170 CLR 394 Zizza v Seymour [1976] 2 NSWLR 135 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Salvatore Russo (Plaintiff) Ronald J Desiatnik (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V Culkoff (Plaintiff) E Peden (Defendant) H Mann (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate