NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MD v R [2015] NSWCCA 37 Hearing dates: 3 February 2015 Date of orders: 20 March 2015 Decision date: 20 March 2015 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Johnson J at [76]; Hall J at [77] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. The sentence imposed in the District Court on 12 September 2013 is quashed. 4. On Count 1 (the first s 66A(2) offence), the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 6 years and 3 months, commencing on 11 June 2012 and expiring on 10 September 2018, with a balance of term of 2 years and 9 months expiring on 10 June 2021. 5. On Count 2 (the second s 66A(2) offence), the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 6 years and 9 months, commencing on 11 December 2012 and expiring on 10 September 2019, with a balance of term of 3 years and expiring on 10 September 2022. The first date the applicant is eligible to be released on parole is on 11 September 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – sentencing – whether sentencing judge failed to give effect to finding of special circumstances – sentencing discretion miscarried – whether some other sentence warranted in law – whether finding of special circumstances should be made on resentencing Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61M(2), 66A(2) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2014 (NSW) cl 218 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 32, s 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Cases Cited: AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203; 225 A Crim R 481 Attorney General's Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 5 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 Fina'i v R [2006] NSWCCA 134 Gavel v R [2014] NSWCCA 56 Jinnette v R [2012] NSWCCA 217 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 Maglis v R [2010] NSWCCA 247 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Power v R [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623 R v Cook [1999] NSWCCA 234 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MD (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann (Applicant) J Pickering SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate