NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shvetsova v University of New England [2015] NSWCATAD 49 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 20 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: 1. Matter is to be determined without an oral hearing.
2. Applicant's application for an order under s 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 is refused.
3. Decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: Access to information – whether applicant is requesting information or advice – whether searches conducted were reasonable Application for order prohibiting disclosure of party's name – whether desirable – relevance of stress to party and effect on party's employment prospects Determination of matter without a hearing – relevant factors Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Cases Cited: Beer v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 23 State of New South Wales (Justice Health) v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Shvetsova v The University of New England [2014] NSWSC 918 Davison v NSW Department of Education and Training [2013] NSWADT 25 Crewdson v Central Sydney Area Health Service [2002] NSWCA 345 Shepherd and Department of Housing, Local Government and Planning (1994) QAR 464 Stanley v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWCATAD 123 Shvetsova v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAD 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elena Shvetsova (Applicant) University of New England (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: E Shvetsova (Applicant in person) University of New England (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410484
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate