NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Waterhouse v The Independent Commission Against Corruption (No.3) [2015] NSWSC 261 Hearing dates: 1 April 2014, 2 April 2014, 30 May 2014 (written submissions), 8 September 2014 Date of orders: 02 April 2015 Decision date: 02 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1)Amended Statement of Claim dated 27 June 2013 is dismissed. (2)Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – decision of Independent Commission Against Corruption (the Commission) to decline to investigate plaintiff's complaints – plaintiff seeks orders under s 65 Supreme Court Act 1970 – regard to age of foundational events which were the subject of the plaintiff's complaint – conduct of the Commission in declining to investigate the complaints was reasonable STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 s 20 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross [2012] HCA 56 Cunneen v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWCA 421 Ex Parte Napier (1852) 18 QB 692 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2002] HCA 54; (2002) 211 CLR 540 Hagan v Waterhouse (1991) 34 NSWLR 308 Hagan v Waterhouse [No.2] (1992) 34 NSWLR 400 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Julius v Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 App Cas.214 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; (1999) 197 CLR 611 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia; ; Plaintiff M69 of 2010 v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41 R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal [1933] HCA 30; (1933) 50 CLR 228 Reg v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Ex Parte Blackburn [1968] 2 QB 118 Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWSC 424 Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No.2) [2014] NSWSC 1515 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Martin Otto Waterhouse (P) Independent Commission Against Corruption (D) Representation: Counsel: In person (P) N J Beaumont SC / N F Case (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate