NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: IAG Limited trading as NRMA Insurance v Tran [2015] NSWSC 263 Hearing dates: 3 March 2015 Date of orders: 20 March 2015 Decision date: 20 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: Summons dismissed. Parties granted leave to make submissions in relation to costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial review of decision of Claims Assessor, Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 – Award made by Claims Assessor by way of buffer for future loss of earning capacity – Whether award of damages for future loss of earning capacity made properly pursuant to s 94 Motor Accidents Compensation Act – Plaintiff contended that there was no evidence to support a finding that "the ageing process when compounded with the injuries will mean that he would be most unlikely to be able to work to normal retirement age as a barman/cellar hand" – whether evidence supported the finding other than the finding as to the ageing process compounding the injuries - Whether there was medical evidence to support the award made for future loss of earning capacity – Evidence of ongoing physical impairment - Whether plaintiff denied procedural fairness because above finding was allegedly made by Claims Assessor without prior indication that such a finding may be made – How future loss of earning capacity is to be assessed – Relevance of ongoing physical restrictions in current employment to potential for future economic loss – 'No evidence' ground and procedural fairness ground of review dismissed - Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery [2005] NSWCA 432 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission [1995] HCA 5; 182 CLR 1 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 4 ALD 139; 44 FLR 41 Minister for Immigration v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Saunders v Adderley [1999] 1 WLR 884 Sretenovic v Reed [2009] NSWCA 280 Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15; 74 NSWLR 419 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, Cross on Evidence, (6th Australian ed), Category: Principal judgment Parties: IAG Limited trading as NRMA (Plaintiff) Cam Tan Tran (First Defendant) Robert Foggo (Submitting Appearance) (Second Defendant) Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales, (Submitting Appearance) (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: MA Robinson SC; J Gumbert (Plaintiff) J Sexton SC; A Oag (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate