NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sabra v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 38 Hearing dates: 9 March 2015 Date of orders: 25 March 2015 Decision date: 25 March 2015 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence - Where unexplained delay of 17 months between admissions made by applicant and charges being laid – Where delay found to have resulted in the applicant becoming anxious and concerned – Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the delay was not to the applicant's detriment – Relevance of delay on sentence
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Whether sentencing judge erred in partially accumulating sentences for offences arising from one course of conduct – Whether sentencing judge erred in making a recognizance release order to operate after the applicant had served 70% of the head sentence
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Offences of revenue fraud – Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive – Whether some other sentence warranted in law Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Blanco v R [1991] NSWCCA 121; (1999) 106 A Crim R 303 Briouzguine v R [2014] NSWCCA 264 Cahyardi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions v Milne [2001] VSCA 93 Eriyo v R [2015] NSWCCA 16 Giourtalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 216 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 JT v R [2012] NSWCCA 133 Kentwell v R [2014] HCA 37 King v R (1998) 99 A Crim R 288 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Panchal v R; R v Panchal [2014] NSWCCA 275 R v Alimic [2006] VSCA 273 R v Gay [2002] NSWCCA 6 R v Hawkins (1989) 45 A Crim R 430 R v Pickard [2011] SASCFC 134 R v Purdon CCA (NSW) 27 March 1991, unreported R v Schwabegger [1998] 4 VR 649 R v Scook [2008] WASCA 114 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marcus Sabra - Applicant Representation: Counsel: Mr I Todd - Applicant Mr T Anderson - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate