NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smythe v Burgman (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 298 Hearing dates: 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 March 2015 Decision date: 25 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Judgment for the defendant. 2. Subject to an application for a different order being made within 7 days hereof, order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: TORTS – alleged medical negligence resulting in amputation of leg – whether general practitioner ought to have diagnosed arterial ischaemia notwithstanding atypical presentation – relevance of subsequent detection of abnormal pulses to determination whether defendant checked pulses and found them to be normal at first examination – whether amputation would or could have been avoided if ischaemia diagnosed at first examination – insufficient evidence to assess the value of chance of avoiding amputation if earlier diagnosis made CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES – evidence of usual practice – inferences from clinical notes – importance of timing of versions given by plaintiff compared with contemporaneous business records Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5D(1), 5E, 5O, 15B(2)(c), 16 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 69(4) Health Practitioner (NSW) Regulation 2010, Sch 2, cll 1, 2 Cases Cited: Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited v Haleluka [2012] NSWCA 343 Connor v Blacktown District Hospital [1971] 1 NSWLR 713 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Limited [1990] HCA 20; 169 CLR 638 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 R v GK [2001] NSWCCA 413 Smythe v Burgman [2015] NSWSC 150 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Texts Cited: Justice D Hodgson, "The Scales of Justice: Probability and Proof in Legal Fact-finding" (1995) 69 ALJR 731 Joe P Chauvapun and Maciej Dryski, "Distal Peripheral Microembolism" 2005 13(1) Vascular 50 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lynne Smythe (Plaintiff) Dr Zoe Burgman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Williams SC/CK Hickey (Plaintiff) M Windsor SC/J Raftery (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate