NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Amritjit Singh v The Walk Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 305 Hearing dates: 19 March 2015 Date of orders: 19 March 2015 Decision date: 19 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: See [35] Catchwords: EQUITY - Purchaser's failure to pay full amount of deposit - Whether Vendor entitled to terminate for breach - Whether Purchaser entitled to relief against forfeiture Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378 Carr v JA Berriman Pty Ltd (1953) 89 CLR 327 Havyn Pty Ltd v Webster (2005) 12 BPR 22,837 Lexane Pty Ltd v Highfern Pty Ltd [1985] 1 Qd R 446 Nassif v Caminer [2009] NSWCA 45 Mehmet v Benson (1963) 81 WN Pt 1 (NSW) 188 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444 Romanos v Pentagold Investments [2003] HCA 58 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amritjit Singh (plaintiff) The Walk Pty Ltd ACN 150 275 719 (first defendant) CBMH Group Pty Limited ACN 112 227 291 (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: A. Singh (in person) (plaintiff) L. Gor (first and second defendants)
Solicitors: Colin Biggers & Paisley (first and second defendants) File Number(s): 2015/28005 Publication restriction: nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate