NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sio v R [2015] NSWCCA 42 Hearing dates: 5 March 2015 Decision date: 31 March 2015 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Johnson J at [56]; Schmidt J at [57] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted.
2. Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – armed robbery – joint criminal enterprise – whether jury's verdict unreasonable – whether statements by accomplice who was unavailable were properly admitted
EVIDENCE – hearsay rule – accomplice – made admissions against interest in police interview – accomplice not available – whether interview made in circumstances that made it likely the representation was reliable – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 65(2)(d)(ii) Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 98 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 65, 67, 135, 137, 165 Evidence Act 1977(Qld), s 93B Evidence Amendment Act 2007 (NSW), Sch 1 Cases Cited: DSG Holdings Australia Pty Ltd v Helenic Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 96; 86 NSWLR 293 Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 13; 234 CLR 124 Finch v Telstra Super Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 36; 242 CLR 254 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Gardner v The Queen [2003] NSWCCA 199 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Huynh v The Queen [2013] HCA 6; 87 ALJR 434 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 Osland v The Queen [1998] HCA 75; 197 CLR 316 Port Stephens Council v Sansom [2007] NSWCA 299 R v Ambrosoli [2002] NSWCCA 386; 55 NSWLR 603 R v Robertson [2015] QCA 11 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 R v Sio [2013] NSWSC 1412 R v SSA [2007] NSWSC 111 R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; 56 NSWLR 182 R v Uittenbosch [2013] QCA 96 Raumakita v R [2011] NSWCCA 126; 210 A Crim R 326 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9; 142 CLR 531 Texts Cited: Uniform Evidence Law (ALRC Report 102) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Sio (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M W Smith (Applicant) G O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate