NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Feili v R [2015] NSWCCA 43 Hearing dates: 16 February 2015 Decision date: 26 March 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [1]; Davies J at [1] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - Appellant convicted of riot - Appellant asleep for parts of trial - whether trial judge erred in finding Appellant fit to be tried - relevant principles - capacity of accused to understand evidence at trial and nature and course of criminal proceedings - ameliorative steps available -legal representatives able to explain proceedings and important evidence - no error demonstrated in trial judge's approach - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: Clarkson v R [2007] NSWCCA 70; 171 A Crim R 1 Ebataringa and Anor v Deland and Ors [1998] HCA 62; 194 CLR 444 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kesavarajah v The Queen [1994] HCA 41; 181 CLR 230 Kunnath v The State [1993] 4 All ER 30 Ngatayi v The Queen [1980] HCA 18; 147 CLR 1 R v Ali; R v Amiri; R v Feili; R v Haidari; R v Parhizkar [2013] NSWSC 871 R v Feili [2013] NSWSC 492 R v Lee Kun [1916] 1 KB 337 R v Presser [1958] VR 45 R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7; 59 NSWLR 284 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Taleb Feili (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Trevallion (Appellant) Mr G Farmer SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate