NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fayle & Minell Cleggett, v The Owners Corporation Strata Plan No 35541 [2015] NSWCATCD 6 Hearing dates: 15 August 2014 Decision date: 15 January 2015 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Ross, General Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed. The original decision of the Adjudicator dismissing the application is affirmed, but for the reasons set out herein. Catchwords: By-law, exclusive use Legislation Cited: Strata Schemes Management Act, 1996 Cases Cited: Italian Forum Limited v Owners – Strata Plan 60919 [2012] NSWSC 895; Chauhan v Jaynrees Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 969; James v Owners Strata Plan No SP 11478 [2012] NSWSC 590. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fayle & Minell Cleggett (applicants) The Owners - Strata Plan No 35541 (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Wells for the applicant
Solicitors: Freeman for the applicant; Ponte for the respondent File Number(s): SCS 14/15227 Publication restriction: Unrestricted
Reasons for decision
Application 1. The application seeks an order setting aside the order of Adjudicator J. Smith dismissing the adjudication application in proceedings SCS 13/62330, and substituting the following: 1. An order pursuant to s 157 (1)(a) of the Strata Schemes Management Act, 1996 that the repeal of Special By-law 8 concerning contributions towards the costs of the air conditioning system servicing lots 2 – 8 and 10 – 14, on 14 May 2013, be revoked. 2. An order pursuant to s 157 (1)(b) or s 157 (1) (c) of the Strata Schemes Management Act, 1996 that Special By-Law 8 concerning contributions towards the costs of the air conditioning system servicing lots 2 – 8 and 10 – 14, which was repealed on 14 May 2013, be revived. 3. Alternatively, an order pursuant to s 169 of the Strata Schemes Management Act, 1996 directing the respondent to take all steps reasonably required to remove the air conditioning system servicing lots 2 – 8 and 10 – 14 from the common property. 1. The adjudication dealt with two By-Laws, one in relation to air conditioning and one in relation to the lift. The dismissal of the adjudication application in respect of the By-Law dealing with the lift is not the subject of appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate