NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alco Electrics Pty Ltd v Waverley Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1066 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 19 March 2015 Date of orders: 20 March 2015 Decision date: 20 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: Modification of Development Consent: approved dual occupancy development: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alco Electrics Pty Ltd (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Nash, barrister (Applicant) Mr M. Staunton, barrister (Respondent) Solicitors: (Applicant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers(Respondent) File Number(s): 10024 of 2015
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Waverley Council of an application (DA – 618/2011/D) to modify DA-618/2011 for alterations and additions to a dual occupancy at 86 Blair Street, North Bondi. 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders. ……………. Commissioner Brown 10024 of 2014 Brown (s34O) (89.6 KB, doc) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 26 March 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate