NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sollazzo v Commissioner of Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATOD 20 Hearing dates: 15 July 2014, 15 October 2014 Decision date: 27 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: N Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and finds that the applicant had at least two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work, obtained while he was either an employee or otherwise lawfully engaged by a person who qualified to supervise him Catchwords: Supervisor licence application – experience - general building work – "otherwise lawfully engaged" Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 Home Building Regulation 2004 Instrument dated 3 July 2013 Cases Cited: Locking v Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 239 Zada v Director-General of Finance and Services, NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 16 Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21 Hale v Commissioner of Fair Trading [2015] NCATOD 1 Ullrich v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 11 Ozcelik v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 100 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Sollazzo (Applicant) Commissioner of Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: CP White & Sons (Applicant) S Robosa, Commissioner of Fair Trading (Respondent) File Number(s): 1420161
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate