NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Bechara (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 319 Hearing dates: 26 February 2015 Date of orders: 27 March 2015 Decision date: 27 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: (1)The orders sought in the notice of motion filed by Mr Bechara on 8 July 2014, is refused.
(2)Unless the parties approach to be heard on costs within 7 days the order as to costs will be that Mr Bechara pay Mrs Bechara's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – notice of motion – order seeking to set aside judgment - leave sought to file amended cross-claim – delay – no explanation for delay - dispute as to matrimonial home – Family Court's jurisdiction - leave sought refused
PROCEDURE – first adjournment application – representative error – adjournment granted – second adjournment application – counsel not ready to proceed – application opposed – further adjournment refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40; (2000) 203 CLR 172 Arthur Anderson Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) [2009] NSWCA 104 Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Bechara [2013] NSWSC 1125 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Bechara (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 721 Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; (2002) 209 CLR 95 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Southern Cross Exploration NL [1988] HCA 13; (1988) 165 CLR 268 Re Wakim; Ex Parte McNally [1999] HCA 27; (1999) 198 CLR 511 Kowalski v Kowalski [1993] FLC 92-342 Port of Melbourne Authority v Ashun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Re Wakim; Ex Parte McNally & Anor [199] HCA 27; (1999) 198 CLR 511 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Plaintiff) Athanassia Bechara (also known Athanassia Bouras) (First Defendant) Cameel Anthony Bechara (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Lawson (First Defendant/Respondent on Motion) Mr D Allen (Second Defendant/Applicant on Motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate