NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Bowie [2015] NSWSC 328 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 March 2015 Decision date: 31 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ball J Decision: 1. The defendant give the plaintiff possession of all the land comprised in certificate of title folio identifier 123/200508 being the land situated at and known as xxxx, Terrigal in the State of New South Wales (the Terrigal Property);
2. The plaintiff has leave to issue a writ of possession in respect of the Terrigal Property;
3. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $768,567.61;
4. The cross-claimant's cross-claim is dismissed;
5. The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - Torrens title - possession of land pursuant to registered mortgage CONTRACTS - general contractual principles - harsh and unconscionable contracts and statutory remedies - Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) - low-doc and no-doc loans - whether loan agreement was unjust in all the circumstances at the time of entry into the agreement - whether lender required to ascertain suitability of loan to borrower - whether lender had constructive knowledge of borrower's personal and financial circumstances through a mortgage broker TORTS - negligence - whether lender under duty of care to prudently assess whether borrower had reasonable prospects of adequately servicing proposed loan - no duty found to exist Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Financial Services Reform Act 2001 (Cth) National Credit Code Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Tong (1997) 41 NSWLR 482 Hogan v Howard Finance Ltd (1987) ASC 55-594 Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 80 Tomlin v Ford Credit Australia Ltd [2005] NSWSC 540 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (Plaintiff) Patricia Ruth Bowie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Newton (Plaintiff) In Person (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate