Wang v Farkas (No 5) [2015] NSWCA 77

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Farkas (No 5) [2015] NSWCA 77 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 30 March 2015 Before: Basten JA Decision: No orders made Catchwords: PRACTICE and PROCEDURE – application to release security – application for extension of time to present case in response – need to consider overriding purpose – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), Pt 6 Cases Cited: Expense Reduction Analyst Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 46; 250 CLR 303 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: James Wang (First Applicant) Y Ping Gu (Second Applicant) George Farkas (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicants (Self-represented) Respondent (Self-represented)

Solicitors: Applicants (Self-represented) Respondent (Self-represented) File Number(s): 2013/22988 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 20 May 2011 Before: North DCJ File Number(s): DC 2006/16064; DC 2006/16035

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]