NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fassas v Maciel [2015] NSWCATAP 60 Hearing dates: on the papers Decision date: 31 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Redfern J, Principal Member Titterton R C, Senior Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Appeal – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – error of law – leave to appeal – substantial miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Pholi v Wearne [2014] NSWCATAP 78 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Theodoras Fassas and Vasiliki Fassas (Appellants) Orlando Maciel and Karen Maciel (Respondents) Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors: File Number(s): AP 14/53217 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 03 October 2014 Before: Bradford C File Number(s): COM 14/44198
REASONS
Introduction 1. Mr and Mrs Fassas seek leave to appeal from a decision of the Consumer and Commercial Division of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the CCD) of 3 October 2014. The CCD dismissed Mr and Mrs Fassas' application for relocation of part of the fence located close to the boundary line between their property and the property of their neighbours, the respondents, Mr and Mrs Maciel. 2. For the reasons that follow we have decided to dismiss the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate