NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fischer v Nemeske Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 79 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 07 April 2015 Before: Beazley P; Barrett JA; Ward JA Decision: The appellant's motion seeking re-opening is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – re-opening after judgment – application by unsuccessful appellants – no matter of principle. Cases Cited: Chianti Pty Ltd v Leume Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 270; 35 WAR 488 Clark v Inglis [2010] NSWCA 144; 79 ATR 447 Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Ward [1970] NZLR 1 Re Baron Vestey's Settlement; Lloyds Bank Ltd v O'Meara [1951] Ch 209 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Robert William Fischer – First Appellant John Jules Fischer – Second Appellant Andrea Juliana Fischer Musser – Third Appellant Sylvia Beth Fischer Kramer – Fourth Appellant Nemeske Pty Limited – First Respondent Lorand Loblay – Second Respondent Karen Loblay – Third Respondent Laura Musser Sloat – Fourth Respondent Tobias Musser – Fifth Respondent Eve Fischer Gregg – Sixth Respondent Seth David Fischer – Seventh Respondent Todd Musser – Eighth Respondent Kathleen Elizabeth Fischer – Ninth Respondent William George Marcel Fischer – Tenth Respondent Corinne Ayers – Eleventh Respondent Aaron Kramer – Twelfth Respondent Marianne Fischer – Thirteenth Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr N C Hutley SC/Mr R A Yezerski (Appellants) Dr C J Birch SC/Mr B DeBuse – (First, Second and Third Respondents) Solicitors: S Moran & Co (Appellants) Curwoods Lawyers (First, Second and Third Respondents) File Number(s): CA 2014/120230
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate