NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 88 Hearing dates: 1 May 2014 Decision date: 13 April 2015 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Basten JA at [192]; Meagher JA at [233] Decision: In Matter No. 2013/64151: Appeal dismissed.
In Matter No. 2014/73353: Summons dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – appeal from Children's Court to District Court – unsuccessful application for leave to apply to rescind care orders – application to Court of Appeal for relief pursuant to s 69, Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) – whether error of law on the face of the record or jurisdictional error established – whether District Court correctly applied provisions of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998, s 90
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – child welfare – care and protection of children – care and protection orders – procedural fairness – apprehended bias – allegation judge biased in approach to assessing applicant's case – allegation of denial of procedural fairness
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – child welfare – care and protection of children – care and protection orders – international treaty obligations – relevance to exercise of discretion – United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
CHILD WELFARE – child welfare – care and protection of children – care and protection orders – whether judge placed excessive or too little weight on applicant's evidence Legislation Cited: Children & Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), ss 79, 81, 90, 91 Child Protection Legislation Amendment Act 2014 (NSW), Sch 1[51] Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 71 Court Suppression & Non-publication Orders Act 2010 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth), Sch 5 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr [2012] NSWCA 13; (2012) 83 NSWLR 302 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 at 156 Boele v Rinbac Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 451 Colquhoun v District Court of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 460 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Dempster v National Companies and Securities Commission (1993) 9 WAR 215 DFaCS (NSW) and the Colt Children [2013] NSWChC 5 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 LXXX v Director-General, Department of Family and Community Services, Lakatos DCJ, (District Court of New South Wales, 2 November 2012, unrep) Le v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 875 Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; (1999) 197 CLR 611 Onesteel Reinforcing Pty Ltd v Sutton [2012] NSWCA 282 Qantas Airways Ltd v Gubbins (1992) 28 NSWLR 26 Re Campbell [2011] NSWSC 761 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary of Department of Family and Community Services (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 226 Re Henry; JL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 89 Re M (No 5); BM v Director-General of Family and Community Services [2013] NSWCA 253 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57; (2000) 204 CLR 82 Re Sarah [2013] NSWCA 379 Re Tracey [2011] NSWCA 43; (2011) 80 NSWLR 261. S v Department of Community Services [2002] NSWCA 151; (2002) 29 Fam LR Sue v Hill [1999] HCA 30; (1999) 199 CLR 462 Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Limited [2014] NSWCA 170; (2014) 86 NSWLR 674 "V V" v District Court of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 469 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JL (Applicant) Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (First Respondent) Mr and Mrs RS (Second Respondents) District Court of New South Wales (Third Respondent) G, AA, AR (Fourth Respondents) Representation: Counsel: JL Self Represented (Applicant) L Goodchild (Amicus Curiae) T Allen (First Respondent) M Anderson (Second Respondents) E Lawson (Fourth Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate