NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Workplace Safety Australia v Simple OHS Solutions Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 84 Hearing dates: 15 October 2014 Decision date: 08 April 2015 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Basten JA at [174]; Emmett JA at [175] Decision: 1.Appeal dismissed 2.Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: TRADE AND COMMERCE – whether agreement is a franchise agreement subject to the Franchising Code of Conduct – whether franchisor has granted franchisee the right to carry on the business of offering, supplying or distributing goods or services – whether business is to be carried on under a system or marketing plan – whether system or marketing plan is substantially controlled by franchisor
CONTRACT – termination – breach - whether time is of the essence for payment of an instalment
EQUITY – estoppel – promissory estoppel – representation - requirement for representation to be clear and unequivocal - whether conduct is reasonably capable of giving rise to a representation
DAMAGES – breach of s 51AD of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Trade Practices (Industry Codes – Franchising) Regulations 1998 (Cth), Schedule – Franchising Code of Conduct Cases Cited: Akron Securities Ltd v Iliffe (1997) 41 NSWLR 353 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kyloe Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1522 Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd [2014] HCA 14; 307 ALR 512 Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187; 69 NSWLR 558 Caltex Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Best [1990] HCA 53; 170 CLR 516 Capital Networks Pty Ltd v .au.Domain Administration Limited [2004] FCA 808 Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55; 1 WLR 1752 Grand Light & Supply Co Inc v Honeywell Inc 771 F 2d 672 (2nd Cir 1985) Hammond v J P Morgan Trust Australia Ltd [2012] NSWCA 295 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 41; 210 CLR 109 Master Education Services Pty Ltd v Ketchell [2008] HCA 38; 236 CLR 101 [2008] HCA 38; 236 CLR 101 Rafferty v Madgwicks [2012] FCAFC 37; 203 FCR 1 Re Application of the News Corp Ltd (1987) 15 FCR 227 United Group Rail Services Ltd v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 177; 74 NSWLR 618 Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited v Simple OHS Solutions Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1936 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M J Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines & Remedies, (5th ed 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited ACN 090 555 570 (Appellant) Simple OHS Solutions Pty Limited CAN 131 250 630 (First respondent) Sue Louise Bottrell (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: Todd Alexis SC / Craig Arnott (Appellant) Mark Ashurst SC / Lee Corbett (First and second respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate