NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bennett v R [2015] NSWCCA 56 Hearing dates: 20 March 2015 Decision date: 08 April 2015 Before: Simpson J at [1] Rothman J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: 1. Grant leave under rule 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW) in respect of the first ground of appeal against conviction.
2. Dismiss the appeal against conviction.
3. Refuse leave to appeal against sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – statutory amendment required two counts to be included on indictment for conspiracy although single conspiracy alleged – defence at trial did not differentiate between periods of the respective counts as far as appellant's intention concerned – whether trial judge's direction to return consistent verdicts in answer to jury's question gave rise to miscarriage of justice in circumstances where defence counsel agreed with the direction – appellant bound by counsel's conduct of trial CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – parity and proportionality – whether sentences gave rise to justifiable grievance when compared with sentences imposed on co-conspirators CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether cumulative sentence manifestly excessive – appropriate approach where offending conduct comprised one conspiracy Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 29D, 86 Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW), r 4 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 135.4 Cases Cited: Agius v The Queen [2013] HCA 27; 248 CLR 601 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 James v The Queen [2014] HCA 6 Lane v R [2013] NSWCCA 317 Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20; 124 CLR 107 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Agius; R v Zerafa [2012] NSWSC 978 R v Green; R v Quinn [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 R v Ronen [2006] NSWCCA 123 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Patrick Bennett (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Francis (Appellant) S McNaughton SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate