NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Kreuzberg [2015] NSWSC 379 Hearing dates: 7 April 2015 Decision date: 08 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) An order pursuant to section 7(4) of Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006: (a) Appointing one qualified psychiatrist and one qualified psychologist to conduct separate examinations of the defendant and to furnish reports to the Supreme Court on the results of those examinations by a date to be fixed by the Court; and (b) Directing that the defendant attend those examinations. (2) The matter is relisted before the Common Law Registrar at 9 am on Wednesday 15 April 2015 for further directions. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – application for mandatory psychiatric examination pursuant to s 7(4) of Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – test arising from combined effect of s 5E and s 7(4) of the Act Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 4, 5A(1), 5E, 7(4), 9(3) Cases Cited: Attorney General for NSW v Hayter [2007] NSWSC 983 State of New South Wales v Lynn [2013] NSWSC 1147 State of New South Wales v Reay [2014] NSWSC 1362 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Jason Kreuzberg (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Plaintiff) S Hall (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid New South Wales (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/68956 Publication restriction: Pseudonym used for the defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate