NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Built NSW Pty Ltd v Politic Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 380 Hearing dates: 2 April 2015 Decision date: 09 April 2015 Before: Ball J Decision: See paragraphs 33 to 37 of this judgment Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Pleadings - Application to amend pleadings - Whether claims are reasonably arguable - Overriding purposes of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) - Whether amendments are likely to result in hearing date being vacated - Whether prejudice will be caused by amendments Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hope v RCA Photophone of Australia Pty Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 348 Kelly v Mina [2014] NSWCA 9 Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson [2011] VSC 136 Retirement Services Australia (RSA) Pty Ltd v 3143 Victoria St Doncaster Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 134; (2012) 37 VR 486 Texts Cited: E Peden and JW Carter, "Entire Agreement – and Similar – Clauses" (2006) 22 JCL 1 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Built NSW Pty Ltd ABN 24 083 928 045 (Plaintiff) Politic Pty Ltd ABN 088 901 759 (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: TJ Breakspear (Plaintiff) D Macfarlane (Defendant)
Solicitors: Lander & Rogers Lawyers (Plaintiff) Gilchrist Connell (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/314472 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate