NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Johan v R [2015] NSWCCA 58 Hearing dates: 3 March 2015 Date of orders: 10 April 2015 Decision date: 10 April 2015 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Simpson J at [3]; Schmidt J at [29] Decision: Leave to appeal be granted but the appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether there was failure to give appropriate weight to age and background when assessing moral culpability – whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive – leave to appeal granted, but the appeal be dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 97(1), s 97(2) Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996 (NSW) (Repealed) Cases Cited: Alvares v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 33; (2011) 209 A Crim R 297 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Cahyadi v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Dougan v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 34; (2006) 160 A Crim R 135 KT v The Queen [2008] NSWCCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 IE v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 70; (2008) 183 A Crim R 150 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 MJ v R [2010] NSWCCA 52 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Bus (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 3 November 1995, unrep) R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Franks [2005] NSWCCA 196 R v Hamied [2007] NSWCCA 151 R v Harris [2007] NSWCCA 130; (2007) 171 A Crim R 267 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Hoang [2003] NSWCCA 380 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Knight [2005] NSWCCA 253; (2005) 155 A Crim R 252 R v Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 270 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; (2006) 164 A Crim R 481 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim 369 R v Smith [2007] NSWCCA 100 R v Voss [2003] NSWCCA 182 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 R v Taufahema [2010] NSWCCA 241 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Vuni v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Harley James Johan Regina Representation: Counsel: Ms C Davenport (Applicant) Ms T Smith (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate