EDE; THACKERAY; KELLY: COSTS in Criminal Cases applications [2015] NSWDC 41

District Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: EDE; THACKERAY; KELLY: COSTS in Criminal Cases applications [2015] NSWDC 41 Hearing dates: 20 February 2015 Date of orders: 10 April 2015 Decision date: 10 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: A Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Bradley EDE Application dismissed. Zach THACKERAY Application dismissed. Graham KELLY Application dismissed. Catchwords: Affray, not guilty verdict, costs application, self-defence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Allerton v Director of Public Prosecutions (1991) 24 NSWLR 550 R v Bradbury [2014] NSWSC 1753 Colosimo v Director of Public Prosecutions (2005) 64 NSWLR 645 R v Dunne, unreported, SC NSW 17/5/1990 R v Fejsa (1995) 82 A Crim R 253 R v McFarlane, unreported, SC NSW 12/8/1994 R v Manley (2000) 49 NSWLR 203 Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2007] NSWCA 121 Nadilo v Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 35 NSWLR 738 R v Padovan [2012] NSWSC 204 R v Smith (1997) 1 Cr App R 14 Texts Cited: D. Ede, Aboriginal ways of using English. Aboriginal Studies Press 2013 Category: Costs Parties: EDE, Bradley (Applicant) THACKERAY, Zach (Applicant) KELLY, Graham (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Crawford-Fish (for Bradley EDE) Mr B Hughes SC (for Zach THACKERAY) Mr C Taylor (for Graham KELLY) Mr B Hatfield (for Director of Public Prosecutions)