NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BKG v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 75 Hearing dates: 24 November 2014 Decision date: 15 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Andrews, Senior Member on 24 November 2014 J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: (1)The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 7 July 2014 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children check clearance is set aside and in substitution the respondent is to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance Catchwords: Administrative law – review under section 27 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Working with children check – clearance – protective jurisdiction – safety and well- being of children - criminal history – serious offences – alcohol factor in offending – rehabilitation of offender Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 (repealed) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Commission for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 111 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BKG (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Fogarty (Applicant) R Lee (Respondent)
Solicitors: L Rogers Solicitor (Applicant) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410366 Publication restriction: Section 64 (1) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – Restriction on publication of information that will identify the applicant, any victims, non-professional witnesses, or evidence given and received in this Tribunal hearing or in the proceedings which is likely to identify those persons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate