NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Causmag Ore Company Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 58 Hearing dates: 23 March 2015 Date of orders: 24 March 2015 Decision date: 24 March 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as set out at [137]-[138] Catchwords: OFFENCES AND PENALTIES – sentence – contravention of condition of environment protection licence – not carry out licensed activities in a competent manner – emission of dust from factory into atmosphere – objective seriousness of offence – dust deposited on properties in neighbourhood – actual environmental harm of low seriousness – practical measures not taken to avoid environmental harm – foreseeability of risk of environmental harm – emission of dust clearly foreseeable if practical measures not taken – full control over causes of commission of offence – low overall objective seriousness – subjective circumstances of offender – record of prior convictions – aggravating factor – early plea of guilty – offender's genuine remorse for the offence – offender's good corporate character – offender cooperated with authorities – appropriate penalty is a fine and publication order – evidence of corporate offender's financial means insufficient to reduce amount of fine – offender ordered to pay prosecutor's costs and prosecutor's costs of investigation Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 21A(2), 21A(3), 22, 23 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 257B Fines Act 1966 s 6 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ss 64(1), 241(1), 248(1), 250(1)(a), 250(1)(e) Cases Cited: Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683; (1993) 82 LGERA 21 Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Environment Protection Authority v Causmag Ore Company Pty Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 205 Environment Protection Authority v Causmag Ore Company Pty Ltd [2009] NSWLEC 164 Environment Protection Authority v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (The Nitric Acid Air Lift Incident) [2014] NSWLEC 103; (2014) 206 LGERA 239 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corp [2006] NSWLEC 419; (2006) 148 LGERA 299 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 163 A Crim R 381 R v Rahme (1989) 43 A Crim R 81 R v Thompson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Wisbey [2001] NSWCCA 434 RCW v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 190 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Causmag Ore Company Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Anderson (Solicitor) (Prosecutor) Mr P S Holland (Solicitor) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate