NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vincent v Woolworths Ltd and Vincent v Counterpoint Marketing & Sales Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 435 Hearing dates: 10, 11, 12, 13 June and 4 July 2014 Date of orders: 17 April 2015 Decision date: 17 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: In matter No. 2010/401259 Judgment for the defendant; The plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis forthwith after they have been agreed or assessed; Second Cross-Claim dismissed with no order as to costs.
In matter No. 2013/190244 Judgment for the defendant; The plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis, if the defendant is otherwise entitled under the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Regulation 2010 (NSW); First Cross-Claim dismissed with no order as to costs. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – liability for injury at work due to collision with trolley at supermarket operated by Woolworths – duty of care owed by Woolworths as the occupier of the premises to an entrant working in the course of their employment for their employer – whether the risk of personal injury is insignificant where risk of harm is reasonably foreseeable
TORTS – negligence – liability for injury at work due to collision with a trolley at a supermarket – duty of care owed by an employer where the employee was working as a merchandiser at another's premises – whether risk was foreseeable according to the common law principles
TORTS – contingent finding – response to identifiable risk – assessment of the burden of alleviating risk by both the employer and the occupier of the premises – where both businesses operate on a national scale
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate