NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd v Troost (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 103 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 20 April 2015 Decision date: 20 April 2015 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Barrett JA at [2]; Emmett JA at [3] Decision: (1) The appeal be allowed.
(2) The orders of the District Court of 16 April 2014 be set aside.
(3) In lieu of the orders of the District Court, there be a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $139,138.95 plus interest on the sum of $132,513.29 from 23 December 2009 to 23 March 2015 in the sum of $53,571.23 and an order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed.
(4) The respondent pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
(5) The respondent be provided with a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if he is so entitled. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – costs – application for indemnity costs – whether it was unreasonable to not accept an offer of compromise – presumption of receipt under s 160 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY – construction of indemnity – whether the appellant is entitled to the costs of these proceedings on the basis that it has suffered "losses" under the indemnity
PROCEDURE – costs – departing from the general rule – failure in a portion of a claim – whether there should be no order as to the costs of the District Court proceedings on the basis that the appellant was unsuccessful in a discrete aspect of its claim Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 160 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.9 Cases Cited: Ankar Pty Ltd v National Westminster Finance (Australia) Ltd [1987] HCA 15; 162 CLR 549 Category: Costs Parties: Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd (Appellant) Representation: Counsel: C Locke (Appellant) P Reynolds (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate