NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ALS v R [2015] NSWCCA 70 Hearing dates: 15 October 2014 Decision date: 21 April 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [41]; Bellew J at [120] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Quash the appellant's conviction on the charge contained in the indictment against him dated 25 July 2013. (3) Enter a verdict of acquittal on that charge. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – carnal knowledge of a person under 10 years of age – appeal against conviction – appeal allowed – whether verdict was unreasonable or insupportable having regard to the evidence – complainant's evidence uncorroborated – inconsistent evidence – majority decision – conviction quashed and applicant acquitted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 67 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 306B(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: ALS v R [2013] NSWCCA 63 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 GL v R [2014] NSWCCA 68 Lachlan Wilson v R [2014] NSWCCA 266 Longman v The Queen [1989] HCA 60; 168 CLR 79 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 487; 118 A Crim R 34 Sami Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Soames v R [2012] NSWCCA 188 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ALS (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P M Strickland SC (Appellant) T L Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate