NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Forgall Pty Ltd v Greater Taree City Council [2015] NSWLEC 61 Hearing dates: 2 March 2015 Date of orders: 23 April 2015 Decision date: 23 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal.
(2) Order the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against Commissioner's decision on a question of law – refusal of development application because development not consistent with zone objectives and prohibited – whether Commissioner denied appellant procedural fairness – failure by appellant to adduce sufficient evidence to establish development's consistency with zone objectives and permissibility – absence of a final landscaping plan – Commissioner did not determine matter on issues not raised by parties – Commissioner not obliged to give notice that absence of final landscaping plan amounted to insufficient evidence – failure by appellant to adduce further evidence did not give rise to failure by Commissioner to afford procedural fairness – finding by Commissioner that Aboriginal cultural heritage report inadequate not determinative of Commissioner's decision – failure to notify appellant that report inadequate did not give rise to failure by Commissioner to afford procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 97(1), 80(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A(1) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 3.7(2),(3)(a) Cases Cited: Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 147; (2013) 201 LGERA 116 Chambers v Maclean Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 100; (2003) 57 NSWLR 152; (2003) 126 LGERA 7 Forgall Pty Ltd v Greater Taree City Council [2014] NSWLEC 1132 Warkworth Mining Ltd v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc [2014] NSWCA 105; (2014) 200 LGERA 375 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Forgall Pty Ltd (Applicant) Greater Taree City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S A Duggan SC with Ms J Reid (Applicant) Mr A J Seton (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate