NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roberts v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATOD 35 Hearing dates: 16 February 2015 Decision date: 22 April 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: W Haylen QC ADCJ Dr M Cox, Professional Member Dr E O'Brien, Professional Member G Ettinger, Lay Member Decision: Application under s163 A of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law for re-instatement to the Registrar of Medical practitioners is granted, subject to conditions set out in the orders of this decision. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW-Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013-application for re-instatement of medical practitioner pursuant to s.163 s.163B and s.163C of Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW)-whether applicant a fit and proper person to be re-instated to the register. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Bahramy v Medical Council of New South Wales (2014) NSWCATOD 116 Ex parte Tziniolis:re the Medical Practitioners Act (1966) 67 SR (NSW) 488 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Roberts (Applicant) Medical Council of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Barnes (Applicant) D Ward (Respondent)
Solicitor: Unsworth Legal Pty Ltd (Applicant) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 1420301
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate